Legal Opinion

McNair v. Boyette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1972No. 34PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiff assigns as error the signing and granting of summary judgment for defendant Boyette contending that there is a genuine issue as to defendant Boyette’s negligence being a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries.

The rules for granting summary judgment under Rule 56 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (G.S. 1A-1) have been fully discussed in recent decisions of this Court. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E. 2d 897 (1972); Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972); Harrison Associates v. State Ports Authority, 280 N.C. 251,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Griffith v. Glen Wood Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API