Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Durham County ABC Board

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 1, 1987No. 8514SC1082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant appellants pose for consideration eleven main questions and several more sub-questions based on eighty-six assignments of error. To avoid repetition some of the questions and sub-questions will be discussed together.

I

Defendants first cite as prejudicial error some thirty-seven remarks made during the course of the trial by the presiding judge, James H. Pou Bailey. Most of the remarks were made to or about defense counsel and defendants argue that they showed the jury that the judge was antagonistic toward them and their counsel. Repeating the remarks would serve no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Meyer v. WallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Wilson v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Coleman v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Carter v. Stanly CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API