Legal Opinion

Hinnant v. Holland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1988No. 8811SC491PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

This wrongful death action arose from a one-car accident in which a passenger was killed. From judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. For the reasons set out below, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.

I

On 19 December 1985, defendant James Neal Holland (“Neal”), age 16, drove his high school classmates to the home of a needy family to deliver Christmas presents as part of a school project. Neal drove a Chevrolet Blazer owned by his father, the defendant James William Holland. On the trip back to school, Sandra Leigh Hinnant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Powell v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Welling v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Cantillano v. WinnerNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API