Legal Opinion
Monogram Mfg. Co. v. Glemby Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 15, 1943No. 255PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by defendants from an interlocutory judgment of the District Court that they have infringed claims 11, 12, 13, and 15 of the Visitación Reissue Patent No. 21,117 and the single claim of the Wallace & Leisy Patent No. 2,156,073 owned by the plaintiff. Both patents are for hair-curling devices and disclose curling instruments which carry hairpins at their *962ends so that withdrawal of the instrument from a curl of hair leaves the hairpin in the curl and the latter in place on the human head. Both patents are challenged for lack of invention, and the reissue…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Cusano v. KotlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Armstrong v. Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.