Legal Opinion
Cusano v. Kotler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 1947No. 9151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff sued the defendant in the District Court for the District of New Jersey for violation of his patent Number 2,312,-882. The only question before that Court and before us is the validity of the patent because the defendant does not deny that if the patent is valid he has infringed it. The District Court found in favor of validity and gave judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
The subject-matter of the plaintiff’s patent is a game table for playing a game more nearly like shuffleboard than any other, although it has some of the features of the once…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Hazeltine Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Ryan Distributing Corporation v. CaleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Measurements Corp. v. Ferris Instrument Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Application of Andrew John MansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Brock v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- White v. E. L. Bruce Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.