Legal Opinion

Picard v. United Aircraft Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 28, 1942No. 244PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. PIAND, Circuit Judge.

Both parties appeal from a judgment in an action to enjoin infringement of claims 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 of Reissue Patent No. 21,031, originally issued on July 21, 1931, to Martin J. Schenk (No. 1,815,868)', the reissue being granted on March 34, 1939. The district judge held claims 4 and 14 — original claims— valid and infringed; he held claims 2, .3, 5, 11, 15 and 16 — likewise original claims —not infringed; and he held claims 17, 18, 19 and 20 — reissue claims — invalid because broadened over the original claims, and also .because of laches…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Howard A. Fromson, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Browder v. GayleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1956

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API