Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 14, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT

This suit concerns important discoveries in the radio art. The contribution of the inventor, Major Edwin Howard Armstrong, with respect to all three of the inventions in suit, was a new technique for suppressing noise in radio sig-nalling known as wide band frequency modulation (FM). This has made possible a substantial improvement in the faithfulness of reproduction of sound transmitted by radio and a marked reduction in noise and interference. Distinguished witnesses with outstanding backgrounds in the radio field have supported plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Esther Marion Armstrong v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. Upjohn Company v. Italian Drugs Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. McCulloch Motors Corp. v. Oregon Saw Chain Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
  4. Mercantile National Bank of Chicago v. Quest, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
  5. Armstrong v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API