Legal Opinion
Doe v. George Wash. Univ.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 27, 2019No. Civil Action No. 18-1391 (RBW)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiffs filed this civil action, using the pseudonyms Jane Does 1 to 5, against George Washington University ("GW") and Kyle Renner, a GW employee being sued in his capacity as GW's General Operations Manager and the plaintiffs' supervisor (collectively, "the defendants"), pursuant to the District of Columbia's Human Rights Act ("D.C. Human Rights Act"), D.C. Code §§ 2-1401 -1404.04 (2001), alleging that the defendants (1) created a hostile work environment ("Count I"), (2) retaliated against them for their complaints of sexual harassment…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Blackmon v. BarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Chan Chan v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Chan Chan v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Clasp v. HassanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Doe 1 v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.