Legal Opinion
Brokenborough v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2013-1757PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Charnita Thomas brings this suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for sexual harassment and retaliation. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 233-41, 249-64), Defendants District of Columbia and Pettiford both moved for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 104, 107). Upon consideration of the District’s and Pettiford’s motions,' and Thomas’s opposition, and for the reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the District’s motion and DENIES Pettiford’s motion.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Charnita…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Murphy v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Redding v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Seed v. McCarthyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Parker v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.