Legal Opinion
U.S. & State v. Coloplast Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 26, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 11–12131–RWZPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
*39Defendant Coloplast Corp. moves for summary judgment on plaintiff-relator Amy Lestage's claim that Coloplast violated the anti-retaliation provision of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h).
I. Factual Background
I summarize the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Planadeball v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., 793 F.3d 169, 172 (1st Cir. 2015).
In 2011, Lestage became a Key Account Manager ("KAM") at Coloplast. KAMs sell medical product devices to distributors and dealers and manage those contractual relationships. They are paid…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chiocca v. The Town of RocklandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Kani-Goba v. BecerraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Nakanwagi v. Executive Office of the Trial CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025