Legal Opinion
Austin-Griffith, Inc. v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 21, 1953No. 16808PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
This is a statutory proceeding to establish and foreclose two liens for labor and materials furnished by Austin-Griffith, Inc. in the erection of a building for Dorothy R. Goldberg and her husband, M. M. Goldberg.
On March 15, 1949, Austin-Griffith, Inc. entered into a contract with the Goldbergs, who then operated a tourist court in Clarendon County, near Summerton, to erect, according to certain plans and specifications, an additional building on the premises for $32,200.00. The contract price was to be paid in installments based on a certain percentage of the value of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Six Companies of Cal. v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Feeney v. BardsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- Ward v. HarenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wait v. StantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bloomfield Reorganized School District No. R-14, Stoddard County v. StitesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Pasadena City Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.