Feeney v. Bardsley
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
This-suit was brought by Feeney, the defendant in error, to recover the balance alleged to be' due to him upon a building contract.
The plaintiff in error relies for reversal upon alleged errors in the charge of the trial court. . -■
The trial judge charged that if the contractor did not substantially comply with the contract he could not recover. *240He told the jury that if a builder contracts to erect a two-story and a half house, and he erects only a one-story and a half house, he cannot recover, although he has added value to the owner’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mackinson v. ConlonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
3Cited by23 opinions
- Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Nordin Construction Company v. City of NomeAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Jardine Estates, Inc. v. Donna Brook Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Power-Matics, Inc. v. LigottiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- R. KREVOLIN & CO., INC. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.