Legal Opinion

Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1983No. 44658PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Twin River Construction Company (“Twin River”), a water and sewer contractor, brought this action against respondent Public Water District No. 6 (the “Water District”) to recover the balance allegedly due under a construction contract. Appellant sought judgment for a total of $71,701.34. Respondent acknowledged liability for only $12,905.03. The trial court disallowed most of appellant’s claims and entered a judgment against respondent for $12,905.03. This appeal followed. We reverse and remand.

In early 1975, the Water District issued an invitation for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Eastmount Construction Company and American Surety Company v. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Juengel Const. Co., Inc. v. Mt. Etna, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Smith v. GithensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Rexite Casting Co. v. Midwest Mower Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Scott v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Peterson v. Continental Boiler Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Sheinbein v. First Boston Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Weitz Co. LLC v. MacKenzie House, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API