Legal Opinion

Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Pasadena City Junior College District

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1963No. L. A. 26950PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Defendant, a junior college district, entered into a contract to pay plaintiff $1,071,325 for the construction of school facilities. The final payment of approximately $137,000 was withheld by defendant, and this action was brought to recover that sum plus interest and $600 for additional work and materials furnished by plaintiff. Defendant thereafter paid plaintiff $102,523.61 of the sum withheld but retained the remainder, claiming certain offsets. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiff with respect to most of the items in dispute, and defendant appeals from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ward v. HarenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Roberts v. Security T. S. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wm. P. Jungclaus Co. v. RattiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Austin-Griffith, Inc. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. Southwest Engineering Co. v. Reorganized School District R-9Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API