Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Pasadena City Junior College District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Defendant, a junior college district, entered into a contract to pay plaintiff $1,071,325 for the construction of school facilities. The final payment of approximately $137,000 was withheld by defendant, and this action was brought to recover that sum plus interest and $600 for additional work and materials furnished by plaintiff. Defendant thereafter paid plaintiff $102,523.61 of the sum withheld but retained the remainder, claiming certain offsets. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiff with respect to most of the items in dispute, and defendant appeals from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ward v. HarenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Roberts v. Security T. S. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Wm. P. Jungclaus Co. v. RattiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Austin-Griffith, Inc. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. Reorganized School District R-9Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.