Estate of Woodward
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
This appeal involves the sole question, one of first impression in California, whether an illegitimate minor child, not publicly acknowledged and adopted by the father (see Civil Code, § 230), and not made an heir by written acknowledgment (see Prob. Code, § 255), is made eligible to receive a family allowance from the estate of such father under Probate Code section 680. The trial court answered this question affirmatively and ordered an allowance. We affirm this order.
The undisputed facts may be briefly stated. Petitioner is the illegitimate child of decedent and Mildred Lineberry (now…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Armijo v. WesseliusWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Caldwell Ex Rel. Eberlein v. KaquatoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Kaur v. ChawlaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Brookbank v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Gordon v. ColeNew York City Family Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.