Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Fulton

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1936No. Civ. 5627PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is a controversy involving the right of appellant as the widow of William Forest Fulton, deceased, to have set aside to her a probate homestead and certain exempt property.

A stipulation as to the facts reveals that William Forest Fulton and Louisa J. Fulton were married and lived together for several years in the county of Stanislaus. In 1928 they separated and in 1931 William Forest Fulton brought an action for divorce on the ground of desertion. Louisa J. Fulton appeared and filed a cross-complaint asking for an adjustment of certain property rights. After a trial upon the issues thus…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Estate of BoesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Estate of GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Abila v. SpendrupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Koutnik v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Estate of FawcettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API