In re the Estate of Noah
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing a family allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
— The appellant, Harriet T. Noah, as widow of the deceased, petitioned the Superior Court for an allowance of one hundred dollars a month for her maintenance, under sections 1466 and 1467 of the Code *584of Civil Procedure. There was no child the issue of the marriage of petitioner and decedent.
The executors answered the petition, and at the trial testimony was given to prove that decedent and petitioner were married October 14, 1875, and after living together five or six weeks, separated, and thenceforth lived separate and apart until his death, which occurred on the 28th of August, 1883; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Estate of Young v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Blackinton v. BlackintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Wentworth v. WentworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- Gilman v. GilmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1865
- Kersey v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.