Legal Opinion
United States v. Bivins
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 30, 1998No. 97-0370; Crim.App. No. 32044PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Chief Judge:
We granted review of two distinct issues. 48 MJ 46 (1997). First, appellant claims that, based on the facts of this case, he cannot be convicted under the general article for bigamy. Art. 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. Second, he claims that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming a finding of guilty of dereliction of duty as a lesser-included offense of disobeying a lawful general order. Both of those offenses arise under Article 92, UCMJ, 10 USC § 892. See United States v. Hode, *32944 MJ 816 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App.1996). We reject…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. RoachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WilleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. SappCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. LeblancUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.