Legal Opinion
United States v. Warner
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 6, 2013No. 13-0435/ARPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant was convicted, inter alia, of possessing images “that depict minors as sexual objects or in a sexually suggestive way,” in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2012). We granted review to determine (1) whether Appellant had fair notice that the charged conduct was prohibited and subject to criminal sanction and (2) whether the evidence of the charged conduct was legally sufficient. We hold that Appellant was not provided fair notice that his conduct was subject to criminal sanction. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Micah J. GourdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. MoonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. PiolunekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. BlouinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. HacklerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.