Legal Opinion
Columbia Realty Venture v. District of Columbia Housing Rent Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1975No. 9586, 9657, 9685 and 10022PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
The petitioners in these four cases seek direct review of orders of the District of Columbia Housing Rent Commission. The petitioners allege that their claims so clearly warrant relief that this court should summarily reverse the orders of the Rent Commission. See Ashe v. Robinson, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 220, 222, 450 F.2d 681, 683 (1971), quoting United States v. Allen, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 84, 85, 408 F.2d 1287, 1288 (1969). The respondent Housing Rent Commission contends in reply that this court is without jurisdiction to review the orders of the Housing Rent Commission at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Rusk v. CortSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- District of Columbia v. Group Insurance AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- District of Columbia v. SullivanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Scholtz Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.