Legal Opinion
Scholtz Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1981No. 79-212, 79-330, 79-336 and 79-435PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
These four petitions for review present questions precipitated under two successive rent control laws because rent increase applications filed under the earlier law were decided after its expiration and the effective date of the successor law. We do not decide the constitutional issues raised by petitioners because of record deficiencies. We affirm the decisions as to three cases— Nos. 79-212, 79-330, 79-336 — but we reverse and remand No. 79-435 for disposition under the Act in effect when the application was filed because of a vested right to a decision under that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Holzsager v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Watergate East Committee Against Hotel Conversion to Co-Op Apartments v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Askin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Foggy Bottom Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.