Legal Opinion

Westheimer v. Weisman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1899No. 11307PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mai-ian, Abijah Wells, and Sam’l W. Mc-Elkoy, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

Ferdinand Westheimer & Sons conducted a wholesale liquor business at St. Joseph, in the state of Missouri, and were authorized under the laws of that state to sell intoxicating liquors. In 1893 their agent and traveling salesman, who was -a resident of Missouri, came to Kansas and solicited an order from the defendant in error at Leavenworth for a barrel of whisky, subject, however, to the approval of the plaintiffs in error at their place of business in Missouri. After the receipt of the order the latter approved the same, selected a barrel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CullinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Feineman v. SachsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Samuel Bowman Distilling Co. v. NuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Westheimer v. WeismanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Hart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. HickoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Moog v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Pabst Brewing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API