Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of Burlingame
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
, In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The Hanover National Bank of the City of New York, the plaintiff in error, discounted the note of G. M. Sheldon for $5,000, due December 24, 1890, and paid the proceeds of this discount to the defendant in error, the First National Bank of Burlingame, Kan. When that note fell due, Sheldon failed to pay it, and the New York bank charged it up against the Kansas hank, but the latter refused to allow or pay any part of this charge, and insisted that the note had been discounted for Sheldon, and not for it. In this way the issue arose whether this note for $5,000 was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Border Nat. Bank v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- Rankin v. TygardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Blodgett v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Roberts v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.