Legal Opinion

Westheimer v. Weisman

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 17, 1898No. 370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Leavenworth district court; Robert ■Crozier, judge pro tern.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McElroy, J.:

The plaintiffs in error, Ferdinand Westheimer & Sons, conduct a wholesale liquor .busi*76ness at St. Joseph, Mo. In 1893 an agent of plaintiffs in error, who resides in Missouri, came to Leavenworth, Kan., called on the defendant, solicited and secured an order from the defendant for a barrel of whisky, subject, however, to the approval of plaintiffs in error at their place of business. Thereafter the plaintiffs in error approved the order, selected the barrel of whisky from their stock, and delivered it on board the cars at St. Joseph,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westheimer v. WeismanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API