Legal Opinion

Samuel Bowman Distilling Co. v. Nutt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Action brought by The Samuel Bowman Distilling Company, a corporation, against A. It. Nutt, before a justice of the peace of Atchison county, Kansas, to recover $113.42, for intoxicating liquors sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. With the plaintiff's bill of particulars, it filed two exhibits, as follows: exhibit a.

Read the full summary

Error from Atchison District Court. Action brought by The Samuel Bowman Distilling Company, a corporation, against A. It. Nutt, before a justice of the peace of Atchison county, Kansas, to recover $113.42, for intoxicating liquors sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. With the plaintiff's bill of particulars, it filed two exhibits, as follows: exhibit a. No. 22. — Atchison, Mch. 9, 1883. — Bowman Distilling Company, St. Louis, Mo.: We have this day ordered through your Mr. Schullman, following, goods, to be shipped by Missouri Pacific at lowest rates: 1 B. Millwood, Spring…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in Atchison county, by the Samuel Bowman Distilling Company, a corporation, against A. R. Nutt, for intoxicating liquors previously sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff is a wholesale liquor dealer at St. Louis, Missouri, and its sales there made of intoxicating liquors are legal and valid. The defendant is a saloon-keeper in Atchison, Kansas, and his sales there made of intoxicating liquors are illegal, and contrary to the statutes of Kansas. The liquors sold in the present case…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Wilson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  3. Adams v. CoulliardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Territt v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  5. Gaylord v. SoragenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Pool ex rel. Pool v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Frankel v. HillierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Westheimer v. WeismanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API