State v. Hickox
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Elk district court; G. P. Aikman, judge. In banc.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
A. L. Hickox was prosecuted for taking orders for intoxicating liquors in violation of the prohibitory liquor law and was convicted upon two counts. The facts in the case are undisputed, and show that Hickox was a traveling salesman for Bernard Holzmark, a liquor merchant of Kansas City, Mo. Holzmark was a resident of Missouri, his office and place of business were in that state, and at no time had he any liquors for sale or other purpose in Kansas. Hickox was also a resident of Missouri, whose only authority was to solicit orders for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crigler v. SheplerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- R. M. Rose Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- State v. HanaphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- In re PringleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- State ex rel. Jackson v. William J. Lemp Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.