Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Billings

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1936No. 7,478PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendants, city of Billings and county of Yellowstone, have appealed from a judgment against them and one James Steele, and in favor of Helen Johnson, plaintiff, for damages in the sum of $3,000 for injuries received when a truck driven by Steele collided with an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding. No question is raised as to plaintiff’s right to recover or the liability of Steele, who is not appealing, but the city and county each contend that the court erred in refusing their several motions for judgment of nonsuit and directed verdict.

The pertinent facts adduced to establish…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Conrad v. . the Trustees of the Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Johnston v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ellinghouse v. Ajax Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Haley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pfost v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rice v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Soulek v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Coldwater v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Devaney v. Lawler Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API