Legal Opinion

Electrical Products Consolidated v. Goldstein

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1934No. 7,272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an action upon an express contract for the payment of money. The action was commenced in the district court of Silver Bow county. Plaintiff, respondent here, alleged in its complaint that in 1932, at Butte, Montana, plaintiff and defendant Jack Goldstein entered into a written contract whereby plaintiff was to furnish defendant with an electric Neon sign at the latter’s place of business in Butte; that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a monthly rental of $45.80 for five years; that defendant paid the rental up to and including the month of September, 1932; that he thereafter used the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Courtney v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Good Roads MacHinery Co. v. Broadwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hough v. Rocky Mountain Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Silver v. MorinMontana Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lillis v. City of Big TimberMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Love v. Mon-O-Co Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Love v. Mon-O-Co Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API