Clark v. Dillman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Replevin by Seward E. Clark and Junius I. Bruce, co-partners, as S. E. Clark & Company, against Louis F. Dillman, for a piano. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs are copartners engaged in the business of selling musical instruments. They appeal from a judgment against them in an action of replevin brought by them for a piano which at one time belonged to them, but which the defendant claims to have purchased from one Pressburg, claiming that Pressburg was plaintiffs’ agent, duly authorized to sell said piano, or at least that the plaintiffs held him out as such agent.
The undisputed evidence shows that the negotiations for the piano were in part between members of the firm and the defendant’s wife, and that Pressburg, who was in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Townsend Savings Bank v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- De Mill v. MoffatMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Ferguson v. MillikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Fletcher v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Michael v. KircherMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Barron v. McLellan Stores Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Mossman v. Millenbach Motor SalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.