Legal Opinion

Barron v. McLellan Stores Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 2, 1942PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The defendant appealed from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Municipal Court of the City of Boston which ordered dismissed the report of the trial judge, who found for the plaintiff in each case. The actions are in tort.

There was evidence that there was a “luncheonette” in the defendant’s store that was operated by a concessionaire known as the “A & S Luncheonette,” a corporation. While the plaintiffs were eating at the luncheon counter, they were injured by the explosion of a can of beans, due to the negligence of an employee of the concessionaire. There was no dividing wall…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Abrams v. Factory Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Brockton National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Ventromile v. Malden Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Sherman v. Texas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. United States Time Corp. v. G. E. M. of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Buck v. Clauson's Inn at Coonamessett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API