Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Mackman.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1872PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Error to St. Clair Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooeet, J.

The plaintiffs in error, defendants below, were sued to recover for damages to the lands of the plaintiff below, caused by the setting bade of water upon such lands by means of a mill-dam. The dam appears to have been erected by a person through whom the defendants derived title, and the wrong alleged against them consisted in keeping it up aftef they became owners. It seems to have been supposed by the parties .that the dam was originally built, and the land flowed, by permission of the then owner of such land, and a license for its construction and continuance was relied upon as a defense…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mumford v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Prince v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  3. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Bradish v. SchenckNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. M'Dowell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Florida Power Corporation v. McNeelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API