Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of Commerce
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court of Ramsey county to recover $3,-246.88. After the former appeal, reported in 109 Minn. 440, the case was tried again before Simpson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Erom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, it appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
On the former appeal (109 Minn. 440, 124 N. W. 236) a new trial was granted for errors in charging the jury. At the second trial the facts were practically the same as at the first, and it now becomes necessary to consider the evidence, and determine whether plaintiff was not entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The learned trial court submitted the question of apparent authority and of authority by estoppel to the jury, and instructed them that there was no evidence of express or implied authority.
Sturm was placed in charge of the Minneapolis department of the Dispatch Printing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Clark v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Eggleston v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jackson v. Muhlenberg Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Edward R. Kenneally, Trustee of Reed Plumbing, Heating and Air-Conditioning, Inc. v. First National Bank of AnokaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Kelly v. Cliff Pettit Motors, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Bloomingdale v. CushmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.