Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Aldrich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus. Relators applied for mandamus to vacate an order allow-Jng an ex-sheriff fees for personal custody of attached property. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Petitioners, who are doing business in the city of Detroit, caused a writ of attachment to be sued out of the circuit court for Kalkaska county against Waldron R. Noteware and George H. Beebe, September 8, 1888, and placed the same in the hands of Myron A. Morrell, sheriff of that county, for service. Morrell, on October 2, 1888, made a return of the writ, showing that he had attached personal property of the defendants to the amount of $1,962.53. On August 27, 1889, the issue *188framed in the cause came on for trial, and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs.

The term of office of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Crofut v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Palmer v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Fletcher v. MorrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Clark v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Roehl Storage Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Petit v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Northern Michigan Lumber Co. v. LyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API