Legal Opinion

Collins v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1944No. S. F. 17019Published

1Opinion of the Court

24 Cal.2d 912 (1944)

SAM L. COLLINS, Petitioner,

v.

HARRY B. RILEY, as State Controller, etc., Respondent.

S. F. No. 17019.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 2, 1944.

Fred B. Wood, Joseph W. Paulucci and Sidney L. Weinstock for Petitioner.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, ChaS.W. Johnson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Raymond McClure, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

GIBSON, C.J.

Petitioner, an assemblyman, seeks a writ of mandate to compel the State Controller to approve a claim for traveling expenses, and to draw a warrant for the amount so approved, in accordance with…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API