Legal Opinion

County of Santa Barbara v. Twitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1919No. L. A. No. 4580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment against them for $2,002.02. The suit was for money illegally paid by the plaintiff to defendant Twitchell, who was a supervisor and ex-officio road commissioner of the county.

With the exception of the amount involved, the case is exactly similar to the four eases in which judgments were affirmed by the district court of appeal of the second district. (County of Santa Barbara v. Rucker et al., 35 Cal. App. 676, [170 Pac. 860].) This court refused to transfer those cases, but counsel for appellants suggest that a re-examination of the questions involved may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Santa Barbara v. RuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. County of Marin v. MessnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API