Legal Opinion
Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1968No. S. F. 22605PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Plaintiff Waldo E. Woodcock, an employee of Barrett Construction Company, was injured on December 16, 1963, at a construction site in Palo Alto. He commenced this action for damages for personal injuries against Fontana Scaffolding and Equipment Company, alleging that it had negligently stacked a number of metal scaffold frames which had fallen on him.
Fontana Scaffolding denied all material allegations of the complaint, alleged negligence on the part of Barrett Construction Company, and claimed a setoff of the workmen’s compensation benefits Woodcock had received. Argonaut Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Cornell v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.