Legal Opinion

United States v. Morris

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 30, 1954No. 3834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

A general court-martial tried the accused and found him guilty under a substantial number of charges and specifications — among them a specification alleging that he had stolen a wrist watch of a value of more than $50, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 50 USC § 715. The convening authority approved the findings and so much of the sentence as provided for dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for three years. An Army board of review concluded that the finding of guilty under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  3. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. GreerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. AllbeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. MinnifieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. DrainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. JettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API