Legal Opinion

United States v. Drain

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 13, 1954No. 4510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMán, Judge:

This case is before us on petition of the accused, Drain. It has to do with the admissibility in evidence at a trial by general court-martial of a deposition, in the taking of which neither the Government nor the accused was represented by counsel certified in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 27(b) (2), 50 USC § 591.

The accused was tried by a general court-martial convened at Wolters Air Force Base, Texas, and — together with one Dooley — was found guilty of assaulting an airman named Jones with intent to influence his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. BradyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. TomaszewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. PorterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API