United States v. Drain
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. BROSMán, Judge:
This case is before us on petition of the accused, Drain. It has to do with the admissibility in evidence at a trial by general court-martial of a deposition, in the taking of which neither the Government nor the accused was represented by counsel certified in accordance with the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 27(b) (2), 50 USC § 591.
The accused was tried by a general court-martial convened at Wolters Air Force Base, Texas, and — together with one Dooley — was found guilty of assaulting an airman named Jones with intent to influence his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. BradyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. TomaszewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. PorterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.