Nordstrom, Inc. v. Gaul
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee and held that claimant’s injury was a material contributing cause of his psychological condition and, therefore, that that condition was compensable. We affirm.
The Board adopted the referee’s findings. On July 25, 1987, claimant injured his back at work. He could not thereafter perform the same tasks. Employer accepted the injury claim. On April 27, 1988, a determination order awarded claimant time loss benefits and permanent partial disability for the injury.
During roughly the same period, claimant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Grace v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Wilkerson v. DavilaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clarke v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Boeing Co. v. ViltrakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- American Nursing v. YostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Boeing Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993