SAIF Corp. v. Hukari
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant’s condition is compensable. We reverse.
Claimant was diagnosed as having Crohn’s Disease, an intestinal illness, in 1981. The disease was not caused by her employment. For three years before the events leading to this claim, she had not experienced symptoms of the disease and was not taking any medication for it. In October, 1988, employer initiated an investigation into alleged misconduct by claimant. The investigation lasted ten weeks, during which time claimant was extremely upset, because she…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Leary v. Pacific Northwest BellOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Sibley v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Fuls v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Mathel v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Aetna Casualty Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.