Legal Opinion
Seck v. Foulks
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1972No. Civ. 12241PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment by the court rendered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8 in. an action by plaintiff against defendants seeking payment of a real estate broker’s commission. Defendant George W. Foulks at all relevant times had full authority to act for and appeared on behalf of his parents, defendants Guy G. Foulks and Elizabeth Foulks; we will use the name “Foulks” to refer to George W. Foulks, the principal defendant in the action.
Facts
Plaintiff Charles Seck, a licensed real estate broker and longtime acquaintance of defendant Foulks,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rader Co. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Friddle v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- R. J. Kuhl Corp. v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.