Legal Opinion

Stromer v. Browning

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1968No. Civ. 11858PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Plaintiff Stromer appeals from an order (and modification thereof) denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside a judgment in favor of defendant. Additionally, an untimely appeal from the judgment itself is before us. Stromer now admits the notice of appeal was filed too late. That appeal must be dismissed.

On a former appeal of a plaintiff’s judgment in this action this court affirmed, and thereafter the California Supreme Court took over and reversed, the trial court’s judgment. That reversal was stated in the last sentence of the opinion. It expressed no directions by the court as to the future…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Roland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LagissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Minnick v. California Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Salaman v. BoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API