Legal Opinion
Hawran v. Hixson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 2012No. D059019PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Paul W. Hawran filed a lawsuit against defendants and appellants Sequenom, Inc. (Sequenom), and Sequenom directors Harry Hixson, Jr., Richard Lemer, and Ronald Lindsay, stemming from representations made in a widely disseminated press release concerning Sequenom’s internal investigation into its handling of certain research and development test data and results, which issued on the same day that defendants filed a legally required disclosure of information to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The trial court granted in part…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Doe v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Cornell v. Berkeley Tennis Club, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Gaynor v. Bulen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bikkina v. MahadevanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.