Legal Opinion
Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. Palmadessa
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 28, 1995No. 94 Civ. 4158 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Daniel Palmadessa (“Daniel”) has moved for dismissal of the Amended Complaint of plaintiffs Red Ball Interior Demolition Corporation (“Red Ball”) and John Palmadessa (“John”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to plead claims upon which relief can be granted, to Rule 9(b) Fed.R.Civ.P., for failure to plead fraud with sufficient particularity, and to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment.
Daniel has also moved to strike certain allegations, pursuant to Rule 12(f); to dismiss or sever all claims and allegations in the Amended…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. PalmadessaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Colonial National Bank USA v. Leventhal (In Re Leventhal)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Felix v. BalkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of I Successor Corp. v. Feld Group, Inc. (In Re I Successor Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hayes v. Central States Orthopedic Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.