Legal Opinion

Southeast Cass Water Resource District v. Burlington Northern Railroad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1995No. Civ. 940106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN Railroad) appeals from a summary judgment declaring it responsible for the costs of necessary modifications to its bridges and culverts to accommodate drainage improvements directed by the Southeast Cass Water Resource District (District) for Cass County Drain 45. We conclude that NDCC 61 — 16.1— 42 constitutionally places upon BN Railroad the continuing responsibility for the costs of accommodating its track to necessary drainage improvements. We affirm.

I

Drain 45 was established in 1948 for part of Cass County at West Fargo along a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Phipps v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API