State v. Skarsgard
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Rockwell Skarsgard appealed from a criminal judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of driving under the influence (“DUI”) and driving under suspension (“DUS”). Skars-gard argued criminal judgments on appeal to this Court are not “convictions” for the purpose of sentence enhancement from a DUI to a DUI-5th, a class C felony, nor for the purpose of sentence enhancement from a DUS to a DUS-4th, a class A misdemeanor. We affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court.
I
[¶ 2] In October 2006, Skarsgard was found guilty by a jury of DUI…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OrrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HigginsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Snortland v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BachmeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TrevinoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. IrwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Cach LLC v. SteeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.