Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of Fargo
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. (“Wild Rice”), appealed from a judgment dismissing its inverse condemnation action against the city of Fargo and from an order denying its post-trial motions. We conclude the trial court correctly ruled that Fargo’s 21-month moratorium on building permits did not constitute a taking of Wild Rice’s property in violation of the federal and state constitutions, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Wild Rice is the owner and developer of a rural residential subdivision along the banks of the Wild Rice River located about three miles south of Fargo.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Knutson v. City of FargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.