Legal Opinion

Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of Fargo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2005No. 20050074PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. (“Wild Rice”), appealed from a judgment dismissing its inverse condemnation action against the city of Fargo and from an order denying its post-trial motions. We conclude the trial court correctly ruled that Fargo’s 21-month moratorium on building permits did not constitute a taking of Wild Rice’s property in violation of the federal and state constitutions, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Wild Rice is the owner and developer of a rural residential subdivision along the banks of the Wild Rice River located about three miles south of Fargo.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Knutson v. City of FargoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API