Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 1977No. 32691, CA 8053PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Petitioner appeals the trial court’s affirmance on writ of review of a decision by the Yamhill County Board of Commissioners approving a variance from the county’s comprehensive plan.

The variance is to construct a single family residence on a five-acre parcel which was partitioned in 1969. In 1975, the county adopted its comprehensive plan designating the area in which the parcel is located as "agricultural/forestry.” The plan further provides that in such areas residences cannot be constructed on tracts containing less than 20 acres. In conjunction with the adoption of the comprehensive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hulburt v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1971
  2. Masters v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1972

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Jurgenson v. County Court for Union CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Meeker v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLATSOP CTY.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API