Legal Opinion

Flury v. Land Use Board of Appeals

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 1981No. LUBA 79-006, CA 17374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Petitioners own 860 acres of land in the North Umpqua portion of Douglas County, 480 acres of which they seek to subdivide into twelve forty-acre parcels. The Douglas County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners (county) approved the proposed plat, known as the "Colliding River Ranches Subdivision.” The county characterized the land as marginal agricultural land for livestock grazing and found the preferred use of the parcels to be for small woodlots. Respondents Talcott and 1000 Friends of Oregon (1000 Friends) petitioned for review before the Land Use Board of Appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. 1000 Friends of Ore. v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Norvell v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. 1000 Friends of Or. v. MULTNOMAH CTY., ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Lemmon v. ClemensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Shadybrook Environmental Protection Ass'n v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Smith v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API