Legal Opinion

M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 28, 1951No. C. D. 1306PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Plaintiff, a dealer in virgin and secondary nonferrous metals, imported at the port of Detroit, Mich., a zinc alloy, which was classified as a combination of chemical elements and assessed with duty at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 5).1 Claim is made for classification as zinc in slabs, dutiable at seven-eighths of 1 cent per pound, either directly under paragraph 394 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802,2 or within the provisions of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Mason v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Lutz v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. United Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. United Metal Goods Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API